翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ South Australian state election, 1979 ・ South Australian state election, 1982 ・ South Australian state election, 1985 ・ South Australian state election, 1989 ・ South Australian state election, 1993 ・ South Australian state election, 1997 ・ South Australian state election, 2002 ・ South Australian state election, 2006 ・ South Australian state election, 2010 ・ South Australian state election, 2014 ・ South Australia (baseball team) ・ South Australia (song) ・ South Australia Act 1834 ・ South Australia Act 1842 ・ South Australia Aquatic and Leisure Centre ・ South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd ・ South Australia Australian rules football team ・ South Australia cricket team ・ South Australia Ice Hockey Association ・ South Australia Nomenclature Act of 1935 ・ South Australia Police ・ South Australia Police Service Medal ・ South Australia Rugby Union ・ South Australia Softball Association ・ South Australia v Commonwealth ・ South Australia v Totani ・ South Australian Amateur Football League ・ South Australian Amateur Soccer League ・ South Australian Archaeology Society ・ South Australian Aviation Museum Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd ''South Australia Asset Management Corpn v York Montague Ltd'' and ''Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co Ltd'' () (UKHL 10 ) is a joined English contract law case (often referred to as 'SAAMCO') on causation remoteness of damage. It arose out of the property crash in the early 1990s, whereby banks were suing valuers for overpricing houses in order to recover the lost market value. Owners themselves had often little or no money, since they had fallen victim to negative equity, so mortgage lenders would pursue a valuer instead to recover some losses. ==Facts== In the South Australia case, a valuer had (in breach of an implied term to exercise reasonable care and skill) negligently advised his client bank that property which it proposed to take as security for a loan was worth much more than its actual market value. The question was whether he should be liable not only for losses attributable to the deficient security but also for further losses attributable to a fall in the property market. The House decided that he should not be liable for this kind of loss. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.